
Five school websites are given for us to comment upon in this assignment. Actually I seldom visit school's website, except for NUS (because I need to obtain necessary information from it and have no choice not to) so I am rather taken aback when I visited the various websites, which were assigned to us. Compared to most commerical websites, most of the school's website that I visited really appeared to be boring and unattractive, aesthetically. I guess the school's website are usually only visited by their own existing students, so there isn't much efforts paid to design & decorate the webpages. I tried Harvard's website and it looked 'bad' as well, though I guess no one will bother if he gets a chance to enter the school. Sometimes, by merely following the design theories and principles is not going to produce a good result. In fact, it can be plain boring. I always prefer designs that redefine the design theories & principles as it might give audience some surprise.
Going back on this assignment 6(b), here are some reasons why I, personally, find Lee University's website having the worst design:
· Visually imbalanced as there is only a big colored picture closer to the left side and a smaller
plain color image closer to the right.
· Unity as most of the words is in black or grey.
· Words are in close proximity (at the top) and sharing similar shades of grey, so it fails to
emphasize and contrast the name of the university.
· Other details and address of the school are all cluttered at the bottom of the webpage and
again, they are all presented in very similar color and font, so it severely lacked of contrast.
· Fairly poor continuity as the various elements does not seem to lead the reader to anywhere.
· The overall feel of the website is rather dull and boring perhaps because of the color of the
texts, which gives me a lifeless feel.
· Lack of ‘breathing space’ as the text is almost at the very end of the webpage as it would
lead the reader’s eyes off the edge.
· Reader might not have realized that he or she could click at the picture to get more
information on the school, thus poor ‘affordability.’
· Rather ‘busy’ and lacked of focus point to catch audience’s attention.