

The poster on the left ("Breakfast at Tiffany's") is a good poster while the one on the right is a bad design poster.
The GOOD poster consists of the following points:
- Figure has more details than the background
- Simple and clear background
- Organized and simplified
- Simple and clear background
- Organized and simplified
- Harmony (visual balance)
- Controlling attention
- Scanning pattern (holding the audience within the frame)
- Easily draw the audience attention to the important points (name of leading actress & title of
- Controlling attention
- Scanning pattern (holding the audience within the frame)
- Easily draw the audience attention to the important points (name of leading actress & title of
the film)
- Contrast in the copy: name of the actress (Audrey Hepburn) and title of the movie
(Breakfast at Tiffany’s)
- Proximity as the figure of Audrey Hepburn (foreground) is bigger than the couple and the
- Proximity as the figure of Audrey Hepburn (foreground) is bigger than the couple and the
buildings (background)
- Gestalt principle of Contrast (good contrast between background and the figure)
- Gestalt principle of Contrast (good contrast between background and the figure)
On the other hand, the BAD poster is...
- Lack of visual harmony as the poster is very cluttered (too many elements -> difficult for
audience to focus their attention)
- Elements in close proximity with each other
- No contrast between the graphics and the text
- No clear separation of figure, snowflakes and text
- Low intensity, dull colors used (varying degrees of white and grey)
- Fail to capture the attention of the audience
- Absence of closure (no path to follow, no direction, does not seem to continue)
- Fail to capture the attention of the audience
- Absence of closure (no path to follow, no direction, does not seem to continue)
Hence, I and my other groupmate (Pin Xiu) felt that the one on left is GOOD poster design whereas the right one is BAD design.
